Jobs •  Cars •  Real Estate •  Apartments •  Shopping •  Classifieds •  Obituaries •  Dating

'Food Fight
Battle of the Bands
advert
advert
Caliente

rule
rule
Caliente Contest
Every year brings another entry
in the "Call of Duty" franchise.
We reviewed the newest game,
"Call of Duty: World at War" in
this week's issue of Caliente.

The games, which are most often
set during World War II, let
players revisit history.

The newest installment focuses
on the final battles of World War
II in the Pacific and Eastern
Europe.

In addition to testing your own
skill, the "Call of Duty" games are
also social endeavors. Players
from around the world can come
together as teams to take on all
comers.

Even though the new "Call of
Duty" is a solid effort, it doesn't
live up to last year's edition,
which updated the setting. What
was the title of the 2007 "Call of
Duty" game?

Those who answer correctly will
have a chance to win a kids DVD.
Titles include "Avatar," "Ben 10,"
"Bratz" and "SpongeBob
Squarepants."

Click here to submit your
answer.

rule
Caliente Cover
Click image below to download a PDF of this week's Caliente cover.

Caliente cover
rule
Aznightbuzz Calendar
rule
rule
rule
rule
poker
The Arizona Daily Star's Brian Pedersen is a mild-mannered reporter by day, but by night (and weekend) he is an aspiring semi-professional poker player. Or at least he thinks so.

Money management

01/04/2008 02:26 PM
bpedersen

I had a plan in 2007, and it worked. Mostly.

And because of that, I’m scrapping a similar plan for 2008.

Confused yet?

The plan I’m talking about was how I was to finance my poker play for an entire year.

After taking up the game seriously midway through 2005 and going through 2006 without much of a course of action, I sat down with my buddy Alex late in 2006 and decided to hash out a way to keep track of not only how well I was playing, but how well I was managing the money I was using to play.

I established myself a bankroll, which anyone involved in poker knows is an essential piece of the puzzle.

I gave myself a set amount of money at the beginning of 2007 that, if I somehow used it all up, that was the end of poker for me.

That money also was to be used ONLY for poker, meaning every penny I won would go right back into the bankroll, and I’d never use non-poker money to play the game.

Well, in terms of performance, I fared very well with this plan. I finished 2007 ahead for the year, despite doing horribly in cash games and only so-so online. I can thank a few big live tournament cashes for keeping me in the black.

But when I sat down to tally up the final numbers for the year, my bank was actually substantially below where it should have been based on how I fared.

The reason: despite all my efforts to separate “poker money” from “life money,” there were just too many times when I allowed the former to be used for the latter.

How did this happen? Simple. It was a matter of not being disciplined.

Say I went to the casino with $300 and walked out with $413 after finishing up a little. Rather than deposit the entire $413 back into my bankroll I would convince myself that I only needed to put $400 in there and keep the other $13 for walking-around money.

But a little here, a little there started to add up. So did times when I’d not follow through with my intentions to always redeposit right after playing and instead end up using that cash the next day on something else because I didn’t want to use a debit card when I had the cash on me.

Of course, it could have been worse, and I could have ended up using money for rent or car payments to play cards, but I learned a long time ago that you should only gamble with money you can afford to lose.

But in a weird way, the fact that I kept allowing myself to use poker money for things other than poker told me I probably put too much into my bankroll. In hindsight, if I’d started myself out on a smaller bankroll I might have had to play lower-limit cash games and tournaments, but then at least I would have that extra money to use for the daily spending of life.

So, when approaching 2008 I had to decide whether to go with a smaller bankroll or scrap it altogether, and I chose to drop bankrolling myself.

Now, when I play I am playing with the approach that — although not very scientific — seemed to work well enough in 2005 and 2006: I will spend a little here and there, when my budget allows me to do so, and it will be almost exclusively online, where you can more easily play at very cheap prices.

As far as playing live, though, I will be severely cutting back on that, usually only playing live when I’ve done well enough online to cash out some.

So, that being said, if you see me — not my avatar — at a poker table, know that I’m having a good month!

That’s all for now, poker lovers — BJP

Back
  1. It is pretty clear you have very little control of more than just your money.
    If tournaments are the only reason you are in the black you really need to reconsider game selection..
    In smaller limit games the toke and rake make it almost impossible to beat the game. I would love to know how much you are stuck for live play and what limits you are playing.
    BTW might want to google me “Arlo Payne WSOP” as one little reference. I have been in this game for years.
    Arlo Payne    01/05/2008 07:16 AM    #
Name
E-mail
http://
Message
  Textile Help

:
:


Search the AZNightBuzz blog postings:


aznightbuzz partners


advert
advert