Jobs •  Cars •  Real Estate •  Apartments •  Shopping •  Classifieds •  Obituaries •  Dating

'Food Fight
BOTB
advert
advert
Caliente

rule
rule
Caliente Contest
UA homecoming this weekend is
all about Wilbur the Wildcat - the
beloved and furry mascot turns
50 on Saturday.

The UA used real animals as
mascots off and on between the
early 1900s and the late 1950s
(with at least one tragic mishap),
until two UA students (Richard
Heller and John Paquette)
pitched the idea of using a
costume-wearing human.

Wilbur made his first appearance
at the UA vs. Texas Tech football
game on Nov. 7, 1959, and was
an immediate hit, according to a
UA Web site.

Wilbur's look has evolved over the
years. It was during one of those
costume makeovers that Wilma
the Wildcat was created.

She made her first public
appearance on March 1, 1986,
during a "blind date" with Wilbur.
The pair later "married" before an
Arizona-Arizona State football
game.

For a chance to win a a set of
three audio books, tell us the
date of their wedding.

Click here to submit your
answer.

rule
Caliente Cover
Click image below to download a PDF of this week's Caliente cover.

Caliente cover
rule
Aznightbuzz Calendar
rule
rule
rule
rule
rule
rule
philmguy
Phil Villarreal has worked for the Daily Star since birth, but he's been the movie critic since February 2001. You could say he's a fan of the cinema. Each day he wakes up to a plate of steaming scrambled movies, which he washes down with a glass of movie juice, all while watching a movie. In his free time he plays video games and watches movies. Phil's new book, the humorous, money saving guide "Secrets of a Stingy Scoundrel" is due out Sept. 1 and available for preorder.

Review: 10,000 B.C.

03/06/2008 10:10 AM
Phil Villarreal

I can’t figure out exactly when the film “10,000 B.C.” is set, but it’s definitely ancient times. Like before they had cars, guns or tabloid blogs. And definitely before they had cohesive plots or dialogue that made sense.

But at least there were sabertooth tigers, mastadons and togas, and at least most of the people knew how to speak English, even if they did so with medieval Scottish accents. The tribes which were too dumb to have invented English yet speak their own crazy gibberish languages, but at least the filmmakers translated it with subtitles, so we could learn “Agllabogatttarangaba” means “Oh No! I’m being impaled by a sabertooth tiger’s saberteeth!” Which is really helpful.

The movie is directed by Roland Emmerich, who surely must have cheated in making his special effects by using actual footage from whatever time it was the movie was set. I’m onto you, Roland. No way your fancy computers and puppets can make mastadons look so real.

The beasts look more true-to-life than the people, in fact. And are mostly better actors. And have more interesting things to say. But oh well. Complaining about stupidity in an action movie is like whining about wild cherry flavoring in Wild Cherry Pepsi. You just accept it and roll with it, and even try to appreciate it a little.

Watch “10,000 B.C.” with the right mindset and you can appreciate it as a fairly effective comedy. As funny as “Juno,” even. The one way “10,000 B.C.” and “Juno” differ is a small story point. Instead of focusing on a wise-cracking teenager who’s looking for someone to adopt her baby, “10,000 B.C.” is about a caveman (Steven Strait) whose cavewoman (Camilla Belle) is kidnapped (i.e., adopted) by a traveling group of supercavemen who are looking for slaves to build their World Trade Centers.

The one thing these supercavemen weren’t counting on was that three people from a tribe they just marauded would track them down and topple their entire empire. If you look it up, I think you’ll discover similar oversights were made by the Roman Empire and the Giuliani campaign.

The funniest part of the movie involves a witch doctor lady who sits in Dhalsim’s Yoga Flame pose and channels the emotions, sights and sounds of the heroes’ journey, flipping out whenever they encounter an enemy or recite painful dialogue. Why she does this I’ll never know. Maybe because this was before the days of DVD back then and all they had was VHS, which were such a hassle because they’d wear out too easily and if you didn’t rewind the tapes before you brought them back to Blockbuster you’d get charged an extra dollar. Plus the picture quality sucked.

The picture quality in “10,000 B.C.” on the other hand, is excellent. Beautiful, even. The only problem is whenever it talks, you get really annoyed and want to cover your ears and scream for it to stop. Just like Nanny from that TV series “The Nanny.” The only real problem in the movie is they forgot to put dinosaurs in. But oh well. Overall the movie isn’t that bad for a bunch of cavemen, who were much stupider than all of us living today. 2.5 stars out of 4.

Back
  1. Damn, I was hoping for a GEICO joke in there, lol. Nice review.

    Did your advance screening have the rumored Dark Knight trailer? My cousin went to a screening last night in Florida just to see the supposed trailer, but his print had none at all.
    Phillip L    03/06/2008 10:47 AM    #
  2. The screening I went to had the trailer. And 10,000 BC sucked by the way.
    Adam Tobias    03/06/2008 11:36 AM    #
  3. Phil – great review. Actually more entertaining than a lot a movies I’ve seen recently.
    Rich Elvers    03/06/2008 03:42 PM    #
  4. great review
    Phillip    03/06/2008 08:31 PM    #
  5. Are you joking, or are you actually that ignorant?
    efrum    03/06/2008 09:30 PM    #
  6. I’ve expected so much more from this.. the story line is like Apocalypse all over again.. a tribe hunting, then getting kidnapped by a more civilized people… plus the cavemen from the northern part had shaved beards, and a boy who was provided the comedy was more like half black… hmmmm
    owwwkey    03/07/2008 12:54 AM    #
  7. I wouldn’t see this if you payed me to. Disgusting looking mess of a film. I could be wrong, but I will never know.
    Nicholas Plowman    03/07/2008 07:36 AM    #
  8. You are that ignorant . I saw that movie 10000 BC last night and it was probably the best movie I have seen all year. You are a critic though and critics can’t enjoy a good movie because there shortsighted. It has to be like, the movie of the millenium to please you guys. And the funny thing is that all of you critics must be this way because I havn’t seen a possitive review yet for this awesome movie. You are all haters.
    soulie17    03/09/2008 09:14 AM    #
  9. I saw it friday, I have to say. Best movie going experience I have ever had. The movie was terrible but I loved how so many people were laughing during certain parts. The people I was with all were laughing out loud at the end. Hilarious! But the movie was still terrible. You can tell they really tried though. IF you need to see it, wait till it comes out on DVD
    Areyoukiddingme    03/10/2008 09:20 AM    #
  10. The movie rocked. Come on and tell me there has been another unique movie out lately. They are all low budget sequels, this was fresh.


    Diana Gostola    04/02/2008 09:02 PM    #
Name
E-mail
http://
Message
  Textile Help

:
:


Search the AZNightBuzz blog postings:


aznightbuzz partners


advert
advert